Since 2007 stories of the 'credit crunch' have been continually been
headline news. The BBC defines the credit crunch as 'a severe shortage
of money or credit' and this phenomenon has had a profound effect on the
world economy. The start of the crisis has been pin pointed to the 9th
August when "French bank BNP Paribas told investors they will not be
able to
take money out of two of its funds because it cannot value the assets in
them, owing to a "complete evaporation of liquidity" in the market"
(BBC). This news resulted in a sharp rise in the cost of credit. But was
this the actual start of all the trouble? It is believed that the
'borrowing culture' particularly in western countries has lead to the
economic downturn. In the years leading up to 2007 levels of borrowing
were very high. A particular problem was the ease in which people were
able to arrange mortgages, sometimes far bigger than the actual value of
the property in question. Mortgage lenders were given attractive
financial incentives to sell mortgages, resulting in not much
consideration regarding whether or not repayments would be met. Since
the crisis began mortgages have been increasingly difficult to obtain.
Today's situation is very different to the years leading up to the
crisis. Today banks are much less keen to lend money, causing problems
particularly for first time home buyers who are finding it increasingly
difficult to get on the property ladder. Following the dot.com bubble
bursting and the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the US Federal reserve tried
to stimulate the economy by reducing interest rates to just 1%. The
cheap available credit encouraged borrowing and in many cases people
were borrowing more money than they were able to pay back. As mentioned
before, mortgages were offered to people who were unable to make
repayments. These are known as sub prime mortgages and these were
ultimately what caused the economic downturn. Banks would pool these
loans together, creating collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). It soon
became apparent that these CDOs were not worthy of the AAA credit
rating attached to them. Once this was realised banks became unwilling
to lend to each other. Subsequently many banks faced tremendous
difficulties. In the UK, Northern Rock had to be bailed out by the bank
of England after it became unable to pay back loans from the money
market. Northern Rock's business model was heavily reliant on the
inter-bank market so once other banks stopped lending money it had a
dramatic effect on the fortunes of the company. Northern Rock used this
short term method of finance to fund lending of mortgages. Following the
announcement of the bail out, depositors withdrew £1bn in one day in
what was the biggest bank run in over 100 years as they were fearful
that they would lose their savings. The UK government responded by
guaranteeing their savings but the damage was already done.
There was also a dramatic turn of fortunes for many other companies,
particularly in the retail sector. Even today, many well known high
street retailers are falling into administration. In recent news,
companies such as HMV and Game have announced their problems and have
been drastically reducing their operations in an attempt to survive.
It seems a stark contrast to the seemingly trouble free years the
proceeded the credit crunch. It is not the first time a 'bubble' has
burst and it will undoubtedly not be the last but looking back it seemed
quite obvious that there would be problems associated with the heavy
borrowing culture that engulfed the western world. Despite the credit
crunch starting over 5 years ago, the world is still greatly affected by
it and many leading economists suggest that it could be until as late
as 2016 before the UK can officially say it is out of 'recession'. So
the future still looks bleak and I have no doubt that we will see the
demise of even more well established businesses. Hopefully a valuable
lesson will be learned from all the events that have occurred and
perhaps people will more cautious about borrowing money which they are
unable to pay back.
Do you think enough restrictions have been imposed on the banks post crisis to ensure this kind of event doesn't happen again?
ReplyDeleteI think efforts have been made, however only time will tell if they will be enough to prevent a repeat occurrence. I believe the extent of this recession should be enough to make banks more cautious and the losses made by many of them should be enough to change the way they operate regardless of any official restrictions.
ReplyDelete